
I have to admit that every time a story about President Obama’s 100th day appears on the teleprompter, I cringe. It’s not the "100 Days" hype that disgusts me. Obama hype is pretty status quo by now, especially amongst us media folk. You either love the President, or you love to hate him. But I'm annoyed by the nation's preoccupation with 'grading' the President. News outlets, particularly in my Republican neck of the woods, have run the classroom motif into the ground. There is a fine line between critique and condescension. Many news organizations have crossed it.
I pulled a few national headlines.
· "This week President Obama and his administration receive their first semester grades "
· "Obama Gets a B-Plus" for his first 100 Days
· "Boehner Gives Low Grade To Obama's 100 Days"
· "National Report Card"
· "Obama's National Security: A Pretty Good Report Card"
Even though coverage has been largely positive, I would argue that the conversation is framed in a biased manner. Traditionally, the 100th Day assesment is prophetic. How has the president's actions thus far alluded to his leadership style and political agenda. On the eve of Obama's 100th day, the debate still centers around whether or not the President has proven himself capable of being the president. I thought we left that debate on the stump.
I remember watching the (Black) US Olympic relay team this past summer drop the baton in the final stretch. I remember thinking "Damn! We almost had it!"I wonder. Are we anxiously waiting for Obama to drop the figurative 'baton'?
The press is capitalizing on strong reservations held by many Americans, even some of his supporters, regarding Obama's ability to meet his goals. News stories that contain subtly racist and paternalistic undertones capitalize on these reservations. There's an interesting intertextual interplay happening between journalist and audience here, and I think it ultimately translates into higher ratings and profit.
The obvious fallacy is that we can form a deft conclusion after his 100th day on the job. His entire term is still a litany of open-ended questions. The best mark that can give the man is an 'incomplete', because it’s impossible to judge the success of initiatives that may take every bit of four years, and then some, to reach fruition.
And what if, theoretically speaking, on April 29th, the American people flunk the President in a national gallop poll? Will that grant them the inalienable right to organize a coup de tat? Rally at the white house steps? Ran-sack Michelle’s vegetable garden? Absolutely not. We patiently await the outcome of his decisions, just like we did with our last president.
The president already aced one helluva test, and it was pass/fail only.
As a journalist, I think we're missing the mark. Obama’s 100th Day in office presents a great opportunity to make sense of shifting political winds. Obama, as a politician, is sui generis. His disciplined, ambitious style of leadership that harkens back to the days of FDR. Internationlly, he is forging alliances that will undoubtedly push foreign policy is a new direction. I'd rather open the discussion up to the future implications, positive and negative, of his policies, as many will bring about sweeping changes within society.
All presidents come under fire on their 100th day, and it is okay to criticize the president. Let me repeat-- It is okay to criticize my Black president. I just hope that we can first, respect him, as the president. He's earned at least that right.









